Библиография

1. 1. Goudenhooft C., Bourmaud A., and Baley C. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) fibers for composite reinforcement: exploring the link between plant growth, cell walls development, and fiber properties. Front. Plant Sci., 10, 411 (2019). DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00411
2. 2. Fogorasi M. and Barbu I. The potential of natural fibres for automotive sector – review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 252, 012044 (2017). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/252/1/012044
3. 3. Goudenhooft C., Bourmaud A., and Baley C. Varietal selection of flax over time: Evolution of plant architecture related to influence on the mechanical properties of fibers. Ind. Crop. Prod., 97, 56–64 (2017).
4. 4. Rozhmina T., Bankin M., Samsonova A., Kanapin A., and Samsonova M. A comprehensive dataset of flax (Linum uitatissimum L.) phenotypes. Data Brief, 37, 107224 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107224
5. 5. Kanapin A., Rozhmina T., Bankin M., Surkova S., Duk M., Osyagina E., and Samsonova M. Genetic determinants of fiber-associated traits in flax identified by omics data integration. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 14536 (2022). DOI: 10.3390/ijms232314536
6. 6. Li M., Zhang Y. W., Xiang Y., Liu M. H., and Zhang Y. M. IIIVmrMLM: The R and C++ tools associated with 3VmrMLM, a comprehensive GWAS method for dissecting quantitative traits. Mol Plant., 15 (8), 1251–1253 (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.06.002, PMID: 35684963
7. 7. You F. and Cloutier S. Mapping quantitative trait loci onto chromosome-scale pseudomolecules in flax. Methods Protoc., 3 (2), 28 (2020). DOI: 10.3390/mps3020028
8. 8. Yan Y., Ham B. K., Chong Y. H., Yeh S. D., and
9. 9. Lucas W. J. A plant SMALL RNA-BINDING PROTEIN 1 family mediates cell-to-cell trafficking of RNAi Signals. Mol. Plant., 13 (2), 321–335 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.12.001
10. 10. Mei Y., Gao H. B., Yuan M., and Xue H. W. The Arabidopsis ARCP protein, CSI1, which is required for microtubule stability, is necessary for root and anther development. Plant Cell, 24 (3), 1066–1080 (2012). DOI: 10.1105/tpc.111.095059
11. 11. Gu Y., Kaplinsky N., Bringmann M., Cobb A., Carroll A., Sampathkumar A., Baskin T. I., Persson S., and Somerville C. R. Identification of a cellulose synthase-associated protein required for cellulose biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107 (29), 12866–12871 (2010). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007092107
12. 12. Landrein B., Lathe R., Bringmann M., Vouillot C., Ivakov A., Boudaoud A., Persson S., and Hamant O. Impaired cellulose synthase guidance leads to stem torsion and twists phyllotactic patterns in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol., 23 (10), 895–900 (2013). DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.013
13. 13. Werner A. K., Romeis T., and Witte C. P. Ureide catabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana and Escherichia coli. Nature Chem. Biol., 6 (1), 19–21 (2010). DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.265
14. 14. Shin I., Percudani R., and Rhee S. Structural and functional insights into (S)-ureidoglycine aminohydrolase, key enzyme of purine catabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem., 287 (22), 18796–18805 (2012). DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.331819
15. 15. Serventi F., Ramazzina I., Lamberto I., Puggioni V., Gatti R., and Percudani R. Chemical basis of nitrogen recovery through the ureide pathway: formation and hydrolysis of S-ureidoglycine in plants and bacteria. ACS Chem. Biol., 5 (2), 203–214 (2010). DOI: 10.1021/cb900248n, PMID: 20038185
16. 16. Bencivenga S., Simonini S., Benková E., and Colombo L. The transcription factors BEL1 and SPL are required for cytokinin and auxin signaling during ovule development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 24 (7), 2886–2897 (2012). DOI: 10.1105/tpc.112.100164
17. 17. Li G., Zhang J., Li J., Yang Z., Huang H., and Xu L. Imitation Switch chromatin remodeling factors and their interacting RINGLET proteins act together in controlling the plant vegetative phase in Arabidopsis. Plant J., 72 (2), 261–270 (2012). DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05074.x
18. 18. Gámez-Arjona F. M., Li J., Raynaud S., Baroja-Fernández E., Muñoz F. J., Ovecka M., Ragel P., Bahaji A., Pozueta-Romero J., and Mérida Á. Enhancing the expression of starch synthase class IV results in increased levels of both transitory and long-term storage starch. Plant Biotechnol. J., 9 (9), 1049–1060 (2011). DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00626.x
19. 19. Seung D., Soyk S., Coiro M., Maier B. A., Eicke S., and Zeeman S. C. PROTEIN TARGETING TO STARCH is required for localising GRANULE-BOUND STARCH SYNTHASE to starch granules and for normal amylose synthesis in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol., 13 (2), e1002080 (2015). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002080
20. 20. Smith S. M., Fulton D. C., Chia T., Thorneycroft D., Chapple A., Dunstan H., Hylton C., Zeeman S. C., and Smith A. M. Diurnal changes in the transcriptome encoding enzymes of starch metabolism provide evidence for both transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of starch metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol., 136 (1), 2687–2699 (2004). DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.044347
21. 21. Layat E., Cotterell S., Vaillant I., Yukawa Y., Tutois S., and Tourmente S. Transcript levels, alternative splicing and proteolytic cleavage of TFIIIA control 5S rRNA accumulation during Arabidopsis thaliana development. Plant J., 71 (1), 35–44 (2012). DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04948.x
22. 22. Barrero R. A., Umeda M., Yamamura S., and Uchimiya H. Arabidopsis CAP regulates the actin cytoskeleton necessary for plant cell elongation and division. Plant Cell, 14 (1), 149–163 (2002). DOI: 10.1105/tpc.010301
23. 23. Hou B., Lim E. K., Higgins G. S., and Bowles D. J. N-Glucosylation of cytokinins by glycosyltransferases of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem., 279 (46), 47822–47832 (2004). DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M409569200
24. 24. Thomann A., Lechner E., Hansen M., Dumbliauskas E., Parmentier Y., Kieber J., Scheres B., and Genschik P. Arabidopsis CULLIN3 genes regulate primary root growth and patterning by ethylene-dependent and -independent mechanisms. PLoS Genet., 5 (1), e1000328 (2009). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000328
25. 25. Groß F., Rudolf E. E., Thiele B., Durner J., and Astier J. Copper amine oxidase 8 regulates arginine-dependent nitric oxide production in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot., 68 (9), 2149–2162 (2017). DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx105
26. 26. Lolle S., Greeff C., Petersen K., Roux M., Jensen M. K., Bressendorff S., Rodriguez E., Sømark K., Mundy J., and Petersen M. Matching NLR immune receptors to autoimmunity in camta3 mutants using antimorphic NLR alleles. Cell Host Microbe, 21 (4), 518–529 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.005
27. 27. Li H. and Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 25 (14), 1754–1760 (2009). DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
28. 28. Tello D., Gil J., Loaiza C. D., Riascos J. J., Cardozo N., and Duitama J. NGSEP3: accurate variant calling across species and sequencing protocols. Bioinformatics, 35 (22), 4716–4723 (2019). DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz275
29. 29. Bradbury P. J., Zhang Z., Kroon D. E., Casstevens T. M., Ramdoss Y., and Buckler E. S. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics, 23 (19), 2633–2635 (2007). DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
30. 30. Purcell S., Neale B., Todd-Brown K., Thomas L., Ferreira M. A., Bender D., Maller J., Sklar P., de Bakker P. I., Daly M. J., and Sham P. C. PLINK: A tool set for wholegenome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 81 (3), 559–575 (2007). DOI: 10.1086/519795