- PII
- S0006302925010195-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0006302925010195
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 70 / Issue number 1
- Pages
- 161-166
- Abstract
- Museum collections of biological specimens are invaluable for research, particularly when paired with modern genetic analysis and omics technology. Although documentation has evolved from paper to digital formats, managing the diverse data requirements of these collections continues to pose challenges. Current software tools are designed for specific tasks and often require advanced technical skills, which can limit accessibility. To tackle these challenges, we developed BearBase, a user-friendly and portable database system that does not necessitate professional expertise. It features both server and client components, supports offline usage, and can sync with mobile devices for fieldwork. Users can easily import data from formats like MS Excel and modify database structure as needed. The open-source code is available on GitHub. Currently, BearBase hosts data on approximately 500 polar bear (Ursus maritimus) specimens from the collection of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg), encompassing those harvested during research and commercial activities dating back to the 19th century. Moreover, the system can be customized to manage other collections of biological or medical specimens.
- Keywords
- биологические коллекции геномика популяционная генетика арктическая фауна базы данных
- Date of publication
- 24.10.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 18
References
- 1. Benham P. M. and Bowie R. C. K. Natural history collections as a resource for conservation genomics: Understanding the past to preserve the future. J. Heredity, 114 (4), 367–384 (2023). DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esac066, PMID: 36512345
- 2. Card D. C., Shapiro B., Giribet G., Moritz C., and Edwards S. V. Museum genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet., 55, 633–659 (2021). DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-071719-020506, PMID: 34555285
- 3. Raxworthy C. J. and Smith B. T. Mining museums for historical DNA: advances and challenges in museomics. Trends Ecol Evol., 36 (11), 1049–1060 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.009, PMID: 34456066
- 4. Crescente J. M., Guidobaldi F., Demichelis M., Formica M. B., Helguera M., and Vanzetti L. S. Phenobook: an open-source software for phenotypic data collection. Gigascience, 6 (4), 1–5 (2017). DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giw019, PMID: 28327910
- 5. Raubach S., Schreiber M., and Shaw P. D. GridScore: a tool for accurate, cross-platform phenotypic data collection and visualization. BMC Bioinformatics, 23 (1), 214 (2022). DOI: 10.1186/s12859-022-04755-2, PMID: 35668357
- 6. Bán M., Boné G. M., Bérces S., Barta Z., Kovács I., Ecsedi K., and Sipos K. OpenBioMaps – self-hosted data management platform and distributed service for biodiversity related data. Earth Sci. Inform., 15, 2007–2016 (2022). DOI: 10.1007/s12145-022-00818-3
- 7. Kimble M., Allers S., Campbell K., Chen C., Jackson L. M., King B. L., Silverbrand S., York G., and Beard K. medna-metadata: an open-source data management system for tracking environmental DNA samples and metadata. Bioinformatics, 38 (19), 4589–4597 (2022). DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac556, PMID: 35960154
- 8. Timón-Reina S., Rincón M., and Martínez-Tomás R. An overview of graph databases and their applications in the biomedical domain. Database (Oxford), 2021, baab026 (2021). DOI: 10.1093/database/baab026, PMID: 34003247
- 9. Page R. D. M. Ozymandias: a biodiversity knowledge graph. PeerJ. 7, e6739 (2019). DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6739, PMID: 30993051
